$4

4 ·
archetype: meme

$4 is alive, but fading. Multiple systems are weakening: nobody is talking about it (3,291 watchlists, no measurable narrative), and it’s moving in line with similar coins (flat over 30 days), though supply is fully out and capped. The price is down 97% from its all-time high.

label capped: score says STRAINED, but coins down 97% don’t earn better labels than WEAKENING. why?

71/100
HIGH
−97%
$0.0090
10/10 top tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0090 ATH $0.2921 (OCT 2025) DRAWDOWN −96.9% RECLAIM 32.6×
break-even from here: +3,160% $100 held here would need to become $3,260 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still talking about it? attention & narrative presence 40/100

Some chatter, not much.

not tracked by attention providers; 3,291 watchlists · bin 6/10 but no measurable narrative presence — held, not discussed.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 85/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +348/30d · +0.8% · bin 9/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [Meme bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 85/100

Easy enough to sell.

$1,029,098/24h · bin 9/1011.49% turnover · bin 9/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 100/100

Little dilution risk left.

Supply fully circulating and capped — no emission overhang.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 45/100

Moving with the pack.

30d +0% · bin 7/10200d -56% · bin 3/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is 4 ($4) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, 4 scores 71/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is 4 a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 71/100 (WEAKENING), a price 97% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will 4 ($4) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +3,160%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — MEME all 556 meme coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 ea94…ce50 Information, not advice.