$BRETT

Brett ·
archetype: meme

$BRETT is alive, but fading. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($12.1m traded per day) — but it’s falling behind similar coins (down 12% over 30 days, down 65% over 200 days). The price is down 98% from its all-time high.

label capped: score says STRAINED, but coins down 98% don’t earn better labels than WEAKENING. why?

67/100
HIGH
−98%
$0.0051
10/10 top tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0051 ATH $0.2342 (DEC 2024) DRAWDOWN −97.8% RECLAIM 45.5×
break-even from here: +4,450% $100 held here would need to become $4,550 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still talking about it? attention & narrative presence 52/100

Some chatter, not much.

narrative activity 4h/24h83,100 watchlists · bin 10/10 — modest narrative presence.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 65/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +1,172/30d · +0.1% · bin 7/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [Meme bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 91/100

Easy enough to sell.

$12,145,388/24h · bin 10/1023.80% turnover · bin 9/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 60/100

Genuinely used.

4,910 transfers/day · bin 10/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — heavy on-chain movement (proxy read). [Meme bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 100/100

Little dilution risk left.

Supply fully circulating and capped — no emission overhang.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 25/100

Lagging similar coins.

30d -12% · bin 3/10200d -65% · bin 3/10 — lagging its peer group badly.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Brett ($BRETT) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, Brett scores 67/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Brett a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 67/100 (WEAKENING), a price 98% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Brett ($BRETT) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +4,450%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — MEME all 556 meme coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 e516…ffbe Information, not advice.