$REAL

Defactor ·
archetype: rwa

$REAL is still alive, but barely. It’s genuinely used (17 transfers/day) — but selling would move the price (only $45 traded per day) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 100% from its all-time high.

34/100
HIGH
−100%
$0.0052
2/10 bottom tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0052 ATH $4.00 (SEP 2025) DRAWDOWN −99.9% RECLAIM 769.5×
break-even from here: +76,850% $100 held here would need to become $76,950 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 11d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 35/100

Holders are staying put.

holders +59/30d · +1.2% · bin 4/10 — holder base is holding steady. [RWA bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 5/100

Selling in size would move the price — exits are hard.

$45/24h · bin 1/100.00% turnover · bin 1/10 — exit liquidity is thin for its class — selling moves the price.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 60/100

Genuinely used.

17 transfers/day · bin 7/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — heavy on-chain movement (proxy read). [RWA bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 35/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

89% of supply circulating · bin 4/10FDV/MC 1.0x · bin 4/10 — meaningful dilution still to come.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 55/100

Moving with the pack.

30d +33% · bin 10/10200d -55% · bin 2/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Defactor ($REAL) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, Defactor scores 34/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Defactor a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 34/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Defactor ($REAL) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +76,850%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — RWA all 265 rwa coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 792d…95c4 Information, not advice.