$FT

Flying Tulip ·
archetype: defi / protocol

$FT is alive, but showing strain. Holders are adding 68% below the high (+50 in 30 days, +7.7%) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 17.9x the market cap). The price is down 68% from its all-time high.

58/100
MEDIUM
−68%
$0.0948
8/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0948 ATH $0.2999 (FEB 2026) DRAWDOWN −68.4% RECLAIM 3.2×
break-even from here: +220% $100 held here would need to become $320 just to get back — and 66 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 95/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +50/30d · +7.7% · bin 10/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 57/100

You could sell, but it would sting.

$331,586/24h · bin 7/100.63% turnover · bin 5/10 — liquidity is light for its class.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 55/100

Some real usage.

72 transfers/day · bin 6/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — moderate on-chain movement. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 5/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

6% of supply circulating · bin 1/10FDV/MC 17.9x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 65/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d -4% · bin 5/10200d +0% · bin 9/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Flying Tulip ($FT) dead?

No, but it’s showing strain. As of 2026-07-14, Flying Tulip scores 58/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — STRAINED. Parts of the system are under pressure. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Flying Tulip a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 58/100 (STRAINED), a price 68% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 50-70%) in which historically only ~34% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Flying Tulip ($FT) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 50-70% (3-year window), about 34% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +220%. The STRAINED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — DEFI / PROTOCOL all 335 defi / protocol coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 a84c…20b8 Information, not advice.