scan / $HUNDRED
my bag

$HUNDRED

HUNDRED ·
archetype: meme

$HUNDRED is alive, but fading. Holders are adding (+1 in 30 days, +0.1%) — but nobody is talking about it (276 watchlists, no measurable narrative), and selling would move the price (only $1,199 traded per day). The price is down 1% from its all-time high.

43/100
HIGH
−1%
$0.00023
5/10 mid-pack
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.00023 ATH $0.00023 (JUL 2026) DRAWDOWN −0.6% RECLAIM 1.0×
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still talking about it? attention & narrative presence 15/100

Nobody is talking about it.

not tracked by attention providers; 276 watchlists · bin 2/10 but no measurable narrative presence — held, not discussed.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 65/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +1/30d · +0.1% · bin 7/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [Meme bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 23/100

Selling in size would move the price — exits are hard.

$1,199/24h · bin 4/100.01% turnover · bin 1/10 — exit liquidity is thin for its class — selling moves the price.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 55/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

100% of supply circulating · bin 9/10FDV/MC 1.0x · bin 6/10no max supply — meaningful dilution still to come — uncapped supply (perpetual emission risk, capped).
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 80/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +4% · bin 7/10200d +29% · bin 10/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is HUNDRED ($HUNDRED) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, HUNDRED scores 43/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is HUNDRED a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 43/100 (WEAKENING), a price 1% below its all-time high. What you do with that is yours.

Will HUNDRED ($HUNDRED) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down <50% (3-year window), about 55% reclaimed their all-time high. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — MEME all 556 meme coins →
$BILLY 43/100 $ANI 43/100 $MGG 43/100 $LION 43/100 $BABYBONK 43/100 $SEN 42/100
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 fc3f…ced7 Information, not advice.