$IMO

IMO ·
archetype: rwa

$IMO is still alive, but barely. It’s genuinely used (26 transfers/day) — but holders are leaving (-17 in 30 days), and selling would move the price (only $27k traded per day) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 91% from its all-time high.

32/100
MEDIUM
−91%
$0.3927
2/10 bottom tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.3927 ATH $4.15 (DEC 2024) DRAWDOWN −90.5% RECLAIM 10.6×
break-even from here: +960% $100 held here would need to become $1,060 just to get back — and 92 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 15/100

Holders are leaving.

holders -17/30d · -0.0% · bin 2/10 — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [RWA bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 25/100

Selling in size would move the price — exits are hard.

$26,799/24h · bin 3/100.61% turnover · bin 3/10 — exit liquidity is thin for its class — selling moves the price.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 60/100

Genuinely used.

26 transfers/day · bin 8/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — heavy on-chain movement (proxy read). [RWA bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 25/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

56% of supply circulating · bin 3/10FDV/MC 1.6x · bin 3/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 50/100

Moving with the pack.

30d +13% · bin 10/10200d -60% · bin 1/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is IMO ($IMO) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, IMO scores 32/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is IMO a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 32/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 91% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 85-95%) in which historically only ~8% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will IMO ($IMO) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 85-95% (3-year window), about 8% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +960%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — RWA all 265 rwa coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 8ad2…1ee7 Information, not advice.