$JUP

Jupiter ·
archetype: defi / protocol

$JUP is alive, but fading. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($19.5m traded per day) — but holders are leaving (-2,985 in 30 days, -0.3%). The price is down 90% from its all-time high.

51/100
HIGH
−90%
$0.2026
7/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.2026 ATH $2.00 (JAN 2024) DRAWDOWN −89.9% RECLAIM 9.9×
break-even from here: +890% $100 held here would need to become $990 just to get back — and 92 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 0d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 15/100

Holders are leaving.

holders -2,985/30d · -0.3% · bin 2/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 79/100

Easy enough to sell.

$19,462,884/24h · bin 10/102.89% turnover · bin 6/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 71/100

Genuinely used.

15,847 active addresses/day · bin 10/1030d trend -17.6% · bin 4/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — usage is strong for its peer group. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 30/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

33% of supply circulating · bin 3/10FDV/MC 2.1x · bin 4/10 — meaningful dilution still to come.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 85/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +16% · bin 9/10200d +1% · bin 9/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Jupiter ($JUP) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, Jupiter scores 51/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Jupiter a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 51/100 (WEAKENING), a price 90% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 85-95%) in which historically only ~8% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Jupiter ($JUP) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 85-95% (3-year window), about 8% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +890%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — DEFI / PROTOCOL all 335 defi / protocol coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 73f3…c3e4 Information, not advice.