$LOOK

LOOK ·
archetype: meme

$LOOK is still alive, but barely. Supply is fully out and capped — but it’s falling behind similar coins (down 62% over 30 days, down 98% over 200 days), and holders are leaving (-195 in 30 days, -1.5%) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 100% from its all-time high.

35/100
HIGH
−100%
$0.00051
3/10 below peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.00051 ATH $0.1307 (NOV 2025) DRAWDOWN −99.6% RECLAIM 257.7×
break-even from here: +25,670% $100 held here would need to become $25,770 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still talking about it? attention & narrative presence 25/100

Nobody is talking about it.

not tracked by attention providers; 690 watchlists · bin 3/10 but no measurable narrative presence — held, not discussed.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 21/100

Holders are leaving.

holders -195/30d · -1.5% · bin 1/10concentration HHI 0.017 · bin 7/10 — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [Meme bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 49/100

You could sell, but it would sting.

$7,364/24h · bin 5/101.57% turnover · bin 6/10 — liquidity is light for its class.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 100/100

Little dilution risk left.

Supply fully circulating and capped — no emission overhang.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 5/100

Lagging similar coins.

30d -62% · bin 1/10200d -98% · bin 1/10 — lagging its peer group badly.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is LOOK ($LOOK) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, LOOK scores 35/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is LOOK a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 35/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will LOOK ($LOOK) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +25,670%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — MEME all 556 meme coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 f724…9d25 Information, not advice.