$NUM is still alive, but barely. Little dilution risk left (90% of supply circulating, fully diluted valuation 1.0x the market cap) — but barely used (8 active addresses/day), and it’s falling behind similar coins (down 21% over 30 days, down 69% over 200 days) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 100% from its all-time high.
break-even from here: +99,740% $100 held here would need to become $99,840 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
01is anyone still building it?structural solvency / liveness33/100
Someone is still building, but activity is thin.
0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 3d ago— development is slowing.
02are holders staying or leaving?holder conviction & overhead supply47/100
Holders are staying put.
holders +5/30d · +0.3% · bin 5/101% of supply in profit · bin 5/1030d exchange netflow -0.02% of supply · bin 6/10data lagged 31d · provider tier— holder base is holding steady. [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
03could you actually sell?liquidity / exitability43/100
You could sell, but it would sting.
$100,665/24h · bin 4/104.41% turnover · bin 6/10— liquidity is light for its class.
04is anyone actually using it?usage / demand15/100
Barely used.
8 active addresses/day · bin 2/10data lagged 31d · provider tier— usage is draining away. [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
05how much more will be printed?supply overhang & emissions65/100
Little dilution risk left.
90% of supply circulating · bin 7/10FDV/MC 1.0x · bin 7/10— limited dilution risk.
06how is it doing vs similar coins?relative strength / narrative15/100
Lagging similar coins.
30d-21% · bin 2/10200d-69% · bin 2/10— lagging its peer group badly.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONSanswers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice
Is Numbers Protocol ($NUM) dead?
Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, Numbers Protocol scores 36/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.
Is Numbers Protocol a good investment?
bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 36/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.
Will Numbers Protocol ($NUM) recover?
Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +99,740%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.
MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINEthe engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
