$QUICK is alive, but fading. Multiple systems are weakening: development has thinned (0 commits in 4 weeks, last commit 6d ago), and dilution risk is moderate (fully diluted valuation 1.5x the market cap), though it’s genuinely used (223 active addresses/day). The price is down 97% from its all-time high.
label capped: score says STRAINED, but coins down 97% don’t earn better labels than WEAKENING. why?
break-even from here: +2,920% $100 held here would need to become $3,020 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
Recent whale activity signal on the record (2026-04-23) — not reflected in the score; check before acting.
01is anyone still building it?structural solvency / liveness39/100
Someone is still building, but activity is thin.
0 commits/4wk1 contributorslast commit 6d ago— development is slowing.
02are holders staying or leaving?holder conviction & overhead supply63/100
Holders are adding, even down here.
holders +20/30d · +3.2% · bin 9/10concentration HHI 0.804 · bin 1/10— holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
03could you actually sell?liquidity / exitability73/100
Easy enough to sell.
$1,044,674/24h · bin 7/1020.52% turnover · bin 9/10— tradeable.
04is anyone actually using it?usage / demand85/100
Genuinely used.
223 active addresses/day · bin 9/1030d trend +45.8% · bin 9/10data lagged 31d · provider tier— usage is strong for its peer group. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
05how much more will be printed?supply overhang & emissions50/100
Meaningful dilution still to come.
67% of supply circulating · bin 6/10FDV/MC 1.5x · bin 5/10— meaningful dilution still to come.
06how is it doing vs similar coins?relative strength / narrative60/100
Outperforming similar coins.
30d-2% · bin 6/10200d-27% · bin 7/10— outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONSanswers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice
Is Quickswap ($QUICK) dead?
Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, Quickswap scores 62/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.
Is Quickswap a good investment?
bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 62/100 (WEAKENING), a price 97% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.
Will Quickswap ($QUICK) recover?
Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +2,920%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.
MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINEthe engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
