$RE

RE ·
archetype: rwa

$RE is alive, but showing strain. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($11.9m traded per day) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 6.3x the market cap). The price is down 51% from its all-time high.

55/100
MEDIUM
−51%
$0.5322
8/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.5322 ATH $1.08 (JUN 2026) DRAWDOWN −50.6% RECLAIM 2.0×
break-even from here: +100% $100 held here would need to become $200 just to get back — and 66 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 81/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +9,866/30d · +164433.3% · bin 10/10concentration HHI 0.206 · bin 5/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [RWA bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 87/100

Easy enough to sell.

$11,899,064/24h · bin 10/1014.00% turnover · bin 8/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 60/100

Genuinely used.

888 transfers/day · bin 10/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — heavy on-chain movement (proxy read). [RWA bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 5/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

16% of supply circulating · bin 1/10FDV/MC 6.3x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 55/100

Moving with the pack.

30d +0% · bin 6/10200d +0% · bin 6/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is RE ($RE) dead?

No, but it’s showing strain. As of 2026-07-14, RE scores 55/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — STRAINED. Parts of the system are under pressure. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is RE a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 55/100 (STRAINED), a price 51% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 50-70%) in which historically only ~34% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will RE ($RE) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 50-70% (3-year window), about 34% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +100%. The STRAINED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — RWA all 265 rwa coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 0c57…a735 Information, not advice.