$QUACK

Rich Quack ·
archetype: meme

$QUACK is still alive, but barely. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline: unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 2.3x the market cap), and it’s falling behind similar coins (down 12% over 30 days, down 83% over 200 days). The price is down 100% from its all-time high.

34/100
HIGH
−100%
$0.
2/10 bottom tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0. ATH $0.0000000155 (NOV 2021) DRAWDOWN −99.8% RECLAIM 537.9×
break-even from here: +53,690% $100 held here would need to become $53,790 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still talking about it? attention & narrative presence 40/100

Some chatter, not much.

not tracked by attention providers; 41,911 watchlists · bin 10/10 but no measurable narrative presence — held, not discussed.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 55/100

Holders are staying put.

holders +6/30d · +0.0% · bin 6/10 — holder base is holding steady. [Meme bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 21/100

Selling in size would move the price — exits are hard.

$362/24h · bin 3/100.03% turnover · bin 2/10 — exit liquidity is thin for its class — selling moves the price.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 5/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

44% of supply circulating · bin 1/10FDV/MC 2.3x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 15/100

Lagging similar coins.

30d -12% · bin 3/10200d -83% · bin 1/10 — lagging its peer group badly.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Rich Quack ($QUACK) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, Rich Quack scores 34/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Rich Quack a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 34/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Rich Quack ($QUACK) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +53,690%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — MEME all 556 meme coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 59d6…1883 Information, not advice.