$SAFE

SAFEbit ·

$SAFE is still alive, but barely. It’s outperforming similar coins (up 36% over 30 days, down 28% over 200 days) — but holders are leaving (-1 in 30 days, -1.9%) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 81% from its all-time high.

35/100
MEDIUM
−81%
$0.0953
3/10 below peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0953 ATH $0.5038 (OCT 2025) DRAWDOWN −81.0% RECLAIM 5.3×
break-even from here: +430% $100 held here would need to become $530 just to get back — and 82 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 4 MEASURED · 2 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 5/100

Holders are leaving.

holders -1/30d · -1.9% · bin 1/10 — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 47/100

You could sell, but it would sting.

$690,993/24h · bin 6/101.46% turnover · bin 4/10 — liquidity is light for its class.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 30/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

49% of supply circulating · bin 4/10FDV/MC 2.0x · bin 3/10 — meaningful dilution still to come.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 85/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +36% · bin 10/10200d -28% · bin 8/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is SAFEbit ($SAFE) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, SAFEbit scores 35/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is SAFEbit a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 35/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 81% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 70-85%) in which historically only ~18% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will SAFEbit ($SAFE) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 70-85% (3-year window), about 18% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +430%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — CEX TOKEN all 38 cex token coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 d137…6cc0 Information, not advice.