$SENT

Sentient ·
archetype: l1 / chain

$SENT is alive, but fading. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($13m traded per day) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 4.7x the market cap). The price is down 72% from its all-time high.

54/100
HIGH
−72%
$0.0133
8/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0133 ATH $0.0481 (FEB 2026) DRAWDOWN −72.3% RECLAIM 3.6×
break-even from here: +260% $100 held here would need to become $360 just to get back — and 82 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 2d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 56/100

Holders are staying put.

holders +62/30d · +1.7% · bin 8/1030d exchange netflow +1.15% of supply · bin 1/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — holder base is holding steady. [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 85/100

Easy enough to sell.

$13,023,732/24h · bin 9/1013.48% turnover · bin 9/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 77/100

Genuinely used.

155 active addresses/day · bin 7/1030d trend +81.0% · bin 10/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — usage is strong for its peer group. [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 5/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

21% of supply circulating · bin 1/10FDV/MC 4.7x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 60/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d -18% · bin 3/10200d +0% · bin 10/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Sentient ($SENT) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, Sentient scores 54/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Sentient a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 54/100 (WEAKENING), a price 72% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 70-85%) in which historically only ~18% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Sentient ($SENT) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 70-85% (3-year window), about 18% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +260%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — L1 / CHAIN all 273 l1 / chain coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 a75e…621e Information, not advice.