$TULIP

Tulip Protocol ·
archetype: defi / protocol

$TULIP is barely breathing. It’s outperforming similar coins (up 6% over 30 days, down 42% over 200 days) — but holders are leaving (-27 in 30 days, -2.0%), and selling would move the price (only $2 traded per day) — the profile of projects that didn’t come back. The price is down 100% from its all-time high.

17/100
LOW
−100%
$0.0128
1/10 bottom tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0128 ATH $50.22 (NOV 2021) DRAWDOWN −100.0% RECLAIM 3,926×
break-even from here: +392,460% $100 held here would need to become $392,560 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
LOW confidence — factors most predictive for DeFi / Protocol assets aren't all wired. Structural read is partial.
02 · STRUCTURE — 4 MEASURED · 2 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 5/100

Holders are leaving.

holders -27/30d · -2.0% · bin 1/10 — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [DeFi / Protocol bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 9/100

Selling in size would move the price — exits are hard.

$2/24h · bin 1/100.01% turnover · bin 2/10 — exit liquidity is thin for its class — selling moves the price.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 10/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

17% of supply circulating · bin 2/10FDV/MC 5.9x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 60/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +6% · bin 8/10200d -42% · bin 5/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Tulip Protocol ($TULIP) dead?

Structurally, it’s close. As of 2026-07-14, Tulip Protocol scores 17/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — FAILING. The structure is failing — this looks like the projects that didn’t come back. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Tulip Protocol a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 17/100 (FAILING), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Tulip Protocol ($TULIP) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +392,460%. The FAILING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — DEFI / PROTOCOL all 335 defi / protocol coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 aa46…a95b Information, not advice.