$PROVE

Succinct ·
archetype: infrastructure

$PROVE is alive, but fading. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($6.1m traded per day) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 5.1x the market cap). The price is down 89% from its all-time high.

52/100
HIGH
−89%
$0.1967
7/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.1967 ATH $1.71 (AUG 2025) DRAWDOWN −88.6% RECLAIM 8.7×
break-even from here: +770% $100 held here would need to become $870 just to get back — and 92 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 0d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 65/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +72/30d · +0.9% · bin 7/10concentration HHI 0.080 · bin 7/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 75/100

Easy enough to sell.

$6,123,987/24h · bin 8/1015.97% turnover · bin 8/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 63/100

Genuinely used.

117 active addresses/day · bin 8/1030d trend -2.9% · bin 5/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — usage is strong for its peer group. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 10/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

20% of supply circulating · bin 2/10FDV/MC 5.1x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 60/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +1% · bin 8/10200d -49% · bin 5/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Succinct ($PROVE) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, Succinct scores 52/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Succinct a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 52/100 (WEAKENING), a price 89% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 85-95%) in which historically only ~8% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Succinct ($PROVE) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 85-95% (3-year window), about 8% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +770%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — INFRASTRUCTURE all 156 infrastructure coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 fb90…bbd0 Information, not advice.