$UMA

UMA ·
archetype: infrastructure

$UMA is still alive, but barely. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline: it’s moving in line with similar coins (down 9% over 30 days), and dilution risk is moderate (fully diluted valuation 1.4x the market cap), though it’s genuinely used (117 active addresses/day). The price is down 99% from its all-time high.

label capped: score says STRAINED, but coins down 99% don’t earn better labels than IMPAIRED. why?

63/100
HIGH
−99%
$0.3690
9/10 top tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.3690 ATH $41.56 (FEB 2021) DRAWDOWN −99.1% RECLAIM 112.6×
break-even from here: +11,160% $100 held here would need to become $11,260 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
Recent whale activity signal on the record (2026-04-30) — not reflected in the score; check before acting.
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 67/100

Actively built and maintained.

0 commits/4wk53 contributorslast commit 1d ago — actively developed.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 57/100

Holders are staying put.

holders +192/30d · +0.7% · bin 7/10concentration HHI 0.145 · bin 4/10 — holder base is holding steady. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 65/100

Easy enough to sell.

$3,831,570/24h · bin 7/1011.33% turnover · bin 7/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 75/100

Genuinely used.

117 active addresses/day · bin 8/1030d trend +18.9% · bin 8/10 — usage is strong for its peer group. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 55/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

71% of supply circulating · bin 6/10FDV/MC 1.4x · bin 6/10no max supply — meaningful dilution still to come — uncapped supply (perpetual emission risk, capped).
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 45/100

Moving with the pack.

30d -9% · bin 5/10200d -50% · bin 5/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is UMA ($UMA) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, UMA scores 63/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is UMA a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 63/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 99% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will UMA ($UMA) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +11,160%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — INFRASTRUCTURE all 156 infrastructure coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 afec…13d6 Information, not advice.