$USUAL

Usual ·
archetype: rwa

$USUAL is still alive, but barely. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($7.2m traded per day) — but it’s falling behind similar coins (down 15% over 30 days, down 66% over 200 days) — the profile of a project in decline. The price is down 100% from its all-time high.

label capped: score says WEAKENING, but coins down 100% don’t earn better labels than IMPAIRED. why?

46/100
MEDIUM
−100%
$0.0088
5/10 mid-pack
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0088 ATH $1.61 (DEC 2024) DRAWDOWN −99.5% RECLAIM 183.2×
break-even from here: +18,220% $100 held here would need to become $18,320 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 35/100

Holders are staying put.

holders +280/30d · +1.2% · bin 4/10concentration HHI 0.340 · bin 4/10 — holder base is holding steady. [RWA bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 95/100

Easy enough to sell.

$7,166,186/24h · bin 10/1045.56% turnover · bin 10/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 41/100

Some real usage.

90 active addresses/day · bin 7/1030d trend -57.2% · bin 1/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — usage is holding. [RWA bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 30/100

Meaningful dilution still to come.

60% of supply circulating · bin 3/10FDV/MC 1.0x · bin 4/10 — meaningful dilution still to come.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 10/100

Lagging similar coins.

30d -15% · bin 2/10200d -66% · bin 1/10 — lagging its peer group badly.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Usual ($USUAL) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, Usual scores 46/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Usual a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 46/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 100% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Usual ($USUAL) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +18,220%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — RWA all 265 rwa coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 d460…e29a Information, not advice.