$VEREM

Verified Emeralds ·
archetype: rwa

$VEREM is still alive, but barely. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline: unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 20.0x the market cap), and holders are leaving (+31 in 30 days, +0.1%). The price is down 99% from its all-time high.

22/100
MEDIUM
−99%
$3.19
1/10 bottom tier
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $3.19 ATH $390.06 (JAN 2026) DRAWDOWN −99.2% RECLAIM 122.3×
break-even from here: +12,130% $100 held here would need to become $12,230 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
02 · STRUCTURE — 4 MEASURED · 2 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 25/100

Holders are leaving.

holders +31/30d · +0.1% · bin 3/10 — holders are leaving — conviction is draining. [RWA bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 35/100

You could sell, but it would sting.

$98,548/24h · bin 4/101.24% turnover · bin 4/10 — liquidity is light for its class.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 5/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

5% of supply circulating · bin 1/10FDV/MC 20.0x · bin 1/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 30/100

Moving with the pack.

30d -25% · bin 1/10200d +0% · bin 6/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Verified Emeralds ($VEREM) dead?

Not dead yet, but core systems are impaired. As of 2026-07-14, Verified Emeralds scores 22/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — IMPAIRED. Core systems are impaired — this looks like a project in decline. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Verified Emeralds a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 22/100 (IMPAIRED), a price 99% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Verified Emeralds ($VEREM) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +12,130%. The IMPAIRED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — RWA all 265 rwa coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 2c55…8243 Information, not advice.