$ZAMA

Zama ·
archetype: infrastructure

$ZAMA is alive, but showing strain. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($7.4m traded per day) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 5.0x the market cap). The price is down 17% from its all-time high.

56/100
HIGH
−17%
$0.0340
8/10 above peers
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0340 ATH $0.0410 (APR 2026) DRAWDOWN −17.2% RECLAIM 1.2×
break-even from here: +20%
02 · STRUCTURE — 6 MEASURED scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 0d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply 71/100

Holders are adding, even down here.

holders +266/30d · +6.7% · bin 10/10concentration HHI 0.487 · bin 1/10 — holders are accumulating against the drawdown. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 71/100

Easy enough to sell.

$7,416,357/24h · bin 8/109.92% turnover · bin 7/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 67/100

Genuinely used.

255 active addresses/day · bin 8/1030d trend +5.7% · bin 6/10data lagged 31d · provider tier — usage is strong for its peer group. [Infrastructure bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 15/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

20% of supply circulating · bin 2/10FDV/MC 5.0x · bin 2/10no max supply — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder — uncapped supply (perpetual emission risk, capped).
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 80/100

Outperforming similar coins.

30d +6% · bin 8/10200d +0% · bin 9/10 — outperforming its peer group.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is Zama ($ZAMA) dead?

No, but it’s showing strain. As of 2026-07-14, Zama scores 56/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — STRAINED. Parts of the system are under pressure. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is Zama a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 56/100 (STRAINED), a price 17% below its all-time high. What you do with that is yours.

Will Zama ($ZAMA) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down <50% (3-year window), about 55% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +20%. The STRAINED aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — INFRASTRUCTURE all 156 infrastructure coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 32de…1d40 Information, not advice.