$ZK

ZKsync ·
archetype: l1 / chain

$ZK is alive, but fading. It’s liquid enough to easily sell ($7.2m traded per day) — but unissued supply hangs over the price (fully diluted valuation 2.1x the market cap). The price is down 97% from its all-time high.

46/100
HIGH
−97%
$0.0102
6/10 mid-pack
01 · RECLAIM OUTLOOK — WILL THE PRICE COME BACK?
PRICE $0.0102 ATH $0.3210 (JUN 2024) DRAWDOWN −96.8% RECLAIM 31.4×
break-even from here: +3,040% $100 held here would need to become $3,140 just to get back — and 97 out of 100 coins that fall this deep never see their old high again.
Recent risk alert signal on the record (2026-06-22) — not reflected in the score; check before acting.
02 · STRUCTURE — 5 MEASURED · 1 PENDING scores 0–100 · peer bins cited vs 2538 scored peers
01 is anyone still building it? structural solvency / liveness 33/100

Someone is still building, but activity is thin.

0 commits/4wk0 contributorslast commit 0d ago — development is slowing.
02 are holders staying or leaving? holder conviction & overhead supply PENDING
PENDING V1

can’t measure this honestly yet, so it doesn’t count toward the score — we don’t fake numbers.

03 could you actually sell? liquidity / exitability 71/100

Easy enough to sell.

$7,193,180/24h · bin 8/107.05% turnover · bin 7/10 — tradeable.
04 is anyone actually using it? usage / demand 60/100

Genuinely used.

1,407 transfers/day · bin 8/10 — transfer activity, not users; proxy tier — heavy on-chain movement (proxy read). [L1 / Chain bins, provisional]
05 how much more will be printed? supply overhang & emissions 25/100

Heavy future supply hangs over the price.

48% of supply circulating · bin 3/10FDV/MC 2.1x · bin 3/10 — heavy unminted/uncapped supply hangs over every holder.
06 how is it doing vs similar coins? relative strength / narrative 30/100

Moving with the pack.

30d -13% · bin 4/10200d -65% · bin 3/10 — middle of its peer pack.
terms used above — hover or tap any:
03 · COMMON QUESTIONS answers generated from this coin’s frozen readout · not advice

Is ZKsync ($ZK) dead?

Not dead, but fading. As of 2026-07-14, ZKsync scores 46/100 on bagcheck’s structural aliveness scan — WEAKENING. Multiple systems are weakening. Aliveness measures whether the project still works, not whether the price recovers.

Is ZKsync a good investment?

bagcheck doesn’t rate investments — this is information, not advice. What the frozen record shows as of 2026-07-14: a structural aliveness score of 46/100 (WEAKENING), a price 97% below its all-time high, a drawdown cohort (down 95%+) in which historically only ~3% of coins ever reclaimed their high. What you do with that is yours.

Will ZKsync ($ZK) recover?

Nobody can predict price, and bagcheck doesn’t try. Historically, of coins down 95%+ (3-year window), about 3% reclaimed their all-time high; break-even to ATH from the scan price needs +3,040%. The WEAKENING aliveness read says whether the project still works — a precondition for recovery, not a promise of it.

MEMBERS · ENGINE BOTTOM LINE the engine’s verbatim verdict — not rendered publicly
SAME SHELF — L1 / CHAIN all 273 l1 / chain coins →
bagcheck v0.17.1 · snapshot 2026-07-14 v16 · scored monthly · batch of 2026-07-14 · frozen JSON ⇩ sha256 208c…7ffc Information, not advice.